(Picture Taken in Trincity)
As stated in the pervious blog the last two posts are
focused on suggestions that are being employed to lessen the environmental and
social unsustainability that may be occurring. This last post in that subject
area is on decentralization. To properly understand decentralization one has to
consider urban size and form. There has been much debate on whether there is an
optimal city size to ensure sustainability and if an increase in city size is
unsustainable (Hall and Barrett 2012). In addition, it is believed that the
larger a city the more energy it uses and also that larger cities have more
environmental problems such as pollution. To solve all those problems listed a
lot of people have turned toward decentralization. Decentralization is a social
process in which population and industry moves
from urban centers to outlying districts in an attempt to reduce environmental
and social unsustainability occurring in cities.
(Picture of Green Spaces Along With Homes in the TMV)
Decentralization allows for
some cities to become less compact and cluttered. Some businesses, government
offices and even industries are moved to other areas. There are a couple of
benefits of decentralization. Decentralization can shorten commuting times
since people will live close to their work place thereby reducing stress and
fuel emissions. In addition, traffic will be reduced because people are
travelling shorter distances and they are all not heading in the same directions,
to the main business district because it would be broken up into parts. Also,
it is more convenient for people if they live, work, enjoy themselves and get
all their necessities in one place. This will ease stress of having to go far
distances. It may also decrease
environmental degradation because businesses, industries etc can be located in
other areas instead of using areas that can be dedicated to green spaces. In
situations like those the businesses do not loose out because there are others
established in the area so it will be a commercial district and also the
environment benefits with the green spaces that would be available or the
ecosystems that will not be disturbed.
However, some is of the
opinion that large settlements may be more sustainable than smaller ones.
According to Hall and Barrett, high population densities in large cities
usually have low car usage and it is at low population density where the car
usage is higher. This maybe because the large cities have mass transit systems
and in the areas of low population the mass transit may not be very reliable or
maybe not present on the whole. Also, large cities are supposed to have the
political and managerial power to deal with environment problems. In addition,
these cities facilitate the formation of technology that could lead us on the
path of sustainability.
In Trinidad there are a few
decentralization projects occurring throughout the country but the most popular
one is probably the Trincity Millennium Vision. In this project are a few
housing schemes for lower, middle and high incomes respectively, areas for offices,
light manufacturing, entertainment, hotels and even health care facilities.
Some of these businesses could relocate from the main urban centers or could be
newly established. The main goal of this project was to create and area where
people could live, work and play all in the same place without having to go
very far. They attempted to create a community where cars were not the main
form of transportation, people would be encouraged to walk or bike and interact
with one another to really create a community of family. Another goal of this
vision was to reduce traffic congestion, which as stated in the previous post
is unsustainable to both the environment and society. They also created green
spaces within the area to add to the aesthetic and be environmentally friendly
even while gaining economically and one of the major green spaces was the golf
course. This plan did not quite achieve all that it wanted from the beginning
so some of the pieces are in place while others are still being worked on. But
when it is completed I think it will definitely be a great place that will
attract a lot of people.
Both sides have been presented so now I will let you decide.....is decentralization good or bad?
References:
Hall and Barrett.
2012. Urban Geography. 4th Edition. London and New York: Routledge Publishing.
In my 10th blog entry i spoke about one of the problems with car based mobility- traffic congestion. In order to reduce traffic congestion i suggested using bikes, walking more, the use of buses, and the use of the water taxi. It didnt occur to me another way to reduce traffic in the city is through decentralistation. I was only focused on different forms of mobility to reduce traffic. Good thinking
ReplyDeleteYes those alternative forms of transport are only part of the way forward. There are other solutions to be considered and partnered with it to achieve maximum results.
ReplyDeleteGreat!
ReplyDelete